THE WSIB POWER IMPLANTS – PART II EVIDENTIARY REQUIREMENTS POLICIES INTRODUCTION This is my second post on the WSIB’s four, mysterious power implants which Schedule 33 of Bill 127 has added to Ontario’s WSIA by means of the “Stronger, Healthier […]
THE WSIB POWER IMPLANTS INTRODUCTION Schedule 33 of Bill 127, the “Stronger, Healthier Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2017”, will amend the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Act in a number of ways, many of them apparently positive from an injured
In the March 2017 issue of the Canadian Journal of Administrative Law & Practice (vol. 30, pp 119-144) one will find an article written by Andrew Taillon (of the Nova Scotia Department of Justice) entitled: “To the Rescue: The Grievance
Unjust by Design – still out there … Read More »
Introduction The author’s March 10, 2017, post in this website described the highlights and implications of the Court of Appeal decision in Castrillo, the Fink & Bornstein class action against Ontario’s WSIB. The class action claims that the Board was
WSIB and Some of the Evidence it Will Have to Confront in Castrillo Read More »
INTRODUCTION It seems likely that visitors to this site will have heard about, or, indeed, have read, the Court of Appeal’s February 13, 2017, decision in Fink & Bornstein’s class action against the WSIB – Pietro Castrillo v. Workplace Safety
WSIB and the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in the Castrillo Class Action Read More »