Following up on the Epiphany article, the author presents the legal argument in support of the need for an independent, appointments-renewal body.
TRIBUNAL INDEPENDENCE CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATION INDEPENDENT APPOINTMENTS-RENEWAL BODY Read More »
The writer reports on an epiphany in his understanding of the basis for the constutional protection of the independence of tribunals.
The validity of the Unjust Budgets article has renewed relevance in light
of the BC Court of Appeal decision in Walter v. BC
Adjudicative Tribunals – Is the Unjust Budgets Constitutional Argument Still Valid? Read More »
Another in the “Replayed” series. For the introduction to the series, see “Unjust by Design Replayed”, Post #1 below. In the passages quoted from Unjust by Design, footnotes are omitted and context-clarifying notes sometimes [added] INTRODUCTION One of the keystone principles of
Unjust by Design Replayed – Post # 6: Professor Hart would not approve. Read More »
Introduction In his last post – Post #7, dated February 3, 2014 – the writer completed his description of each of the five reasons the Saskatchewan Attorney General presented to the Supreme Court as to why the unions’ applications for