Another in the Ontario workers’ compensation series. For the introduction to the series, see Post #1 in this series below. INTRODUCTION This post addresses three topics: 1) The status of the common law’s “thin skull” rule in the determination of permanent […]
Doctor Claims Medical Opinion Led to Her Dismissal Another in the Ontario workers’ compensation series. (For the introduction to the series, see Post #1 referenced below.) The Toronto Star reports that a doctor is suing the Ontario WSIB and her former
Administrative Justice in Workers’ Compensation – Post #2 – Biased Medical Opinions? Read More »
PREFACE This post is the first in a series focused on justice issues in Ontario’s workers’ compensation administrative justice system. In that system, as in so many others, the rule of law has been disrespected and in this series of
Administrative Justice in Workers’ Compensation – Post #1: Tribunal Denial Read More »
Another in the “Replayed” series. For the introduction to the series, see “Unjust by Design Replayed”, Post #1 below. In the passages quoted from Unjust by Design, footnotes are omitted and context-clarifying notes sometimes [added] THE PROBLEM OF “UNLIKE” TRIBUNAL DECISIONS Post
INTRODUCTION I am indebted to a colleague for bringing the following entry in the Labor and Employment Section of the ABA (American Bar Association) Journal to my attention. The url link below will take you to the ABA Journal and
Administrative Justice Adjudicators – Chicken Pluckers? Really? Read More »